Op 18-04-16 om 13:29 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> When a vblank wait times out in intel_atomic_wait_for_vblanks() we just
> get a cryptic 'WARN_ON(!ret)' backtrace in dmesg. Repace it with
> something that tells you what actually happened.
>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 4cca155376be..7bdbe4b03591 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -13523,7 +13523,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_wait_for_vblanks(struct 
> drm_device *dev,
>                                       drm_crtc_vblank_count(crtc),
>                               msecs_to_jiffies(50));
>  
> -             WARN_ON(!lret);
> +             WARN(!lret, "pipe %c vblank wait timed out\n", pipe_name(pipe));
>  
>               drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
>       }
This helper function was never meant to last as long as it did. :(

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to