On Thu, 07 Apr 2016, kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
> [cannot apply to v4.6-rc2 next-20160407]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to 
> help improving the system]
>
> url:    
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jani-Nikula/drm-i915-dsi-improved-gpio-element-support-for-vlv-chv-bxt/20160407-223107
> base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
> config: x86_64-randconfig-a0-04072115 (attached as .config)

Meh, including linux/gpio.h works for CONFIG_GPIOLIB=y, but it fails to
include the consumer function stubs for CONFIG_GPIOLIB=n. The fix is to
include linux/gpio/consumer.h instead.

BR,
Jani.


> reproduce:
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=x86_64 
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c: In function 'bxt_exec_gpio':
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c:307:15: error: implicit 
>>> declaration of function 'devm_gpiod_get_index' 
>>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>       gpio_desc = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev_priv->dev->dev,
>                   ^
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c:309:16: error: 'GPIOD_OUT_LOW' 
>>> undeclared (first use in this function)
>            value ? GPIOD_OUT_LOW :
>                    ^
>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c:309:16: note: each undeclared 
> identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c:310:8: error: 'GPIOD_OUT_HIGH' 
>>> undeclared (first use in this function)
>            GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>            ^
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c:321:2: error: implicit 
>>> declaration of function 'gpiod_set_value' 
>>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      gpiod_set_value(gpio_desc, value);
>      ^
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> vim +/devm_gpiod_get_index +307 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
>
>    301        {
>    302                /* XXX: this table is a quick ugly hack. */
>    303                static struct gpio_desc *bxt_gpio_table[U8_MAX + 1];
>    304                struct gpio_desc *gpio_desc = 
> bxt_gpio_table[gpio_index];
>    305        
>    306                if (!gpio_desc) {
>  > 307                        gpio_desc = 
> devm_gpiod_get_index(dev_priv->dev->dev,
>    308                                                         NULL, 
> gpio_index,
>  > 309                                                         value ? 
> GPIOD_OUT_LOW :
>  > 310                                                         
> GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>    311        
>    312                        if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(gpio_desc)) {
>    313                                DRM_ERROR("GPIO index %u request failed 
> (%ld)\n",
>    314                                          gpio_index, 
> PTR_ERR(gpio_desc));
>    315                                return;
>    316                        }
>    317        
>    318                        bxt_gpio_table[gpio_index] = gpio_desc;
>    319                }
>    320        
>  > 321                gpiod_set_value(gpio_desc, value);
>    322        }
>    323        
>    324        static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, 
> const u8 *data)
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to