On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > /* See also use_cpu_reloc() */ > >- if (HAS_LLC(vma->obj->base.dev)) > >+ if (HAS_LLC(vma->obj)) > > Things like HAS_LLC(obj) and HAS_LLC(engine) are IMHO illogical and > non-intuitive.
Does this object/engine have last-line coherency, seems to make sense to me. The goal has been to shift these to using dev_priv, for 2 reaons, on the hotpaths careless pointer dereferencing adds extra memory loads that are not immediately obvious unless you are familar with the macros and the second reason is that widespread dev -> dev_private -> dev spreads add a few extra pages of object size just from the extra mov instructions! INTEL_INFO() is definitely a more subjective matter of taste, but anything other then INTEL_INFO(i915) is a stopgap imo. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
