Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> writes:

> On to, 2016-02-18 at 17:21 +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> It has been observed that sometimes disabling the dc6 fails
>> and dc6 state pops back up, brief moment after disabling. This
>> has to be dmc save/restore timing issue or other bug in the
>> way dc states are handled.
>> 
>> Try to work around this issue as we don't have firmware fix
>> yet available. Verify that the value we wrote for the dmc sticks,
>> and also enforce it by rewriting it, if it didn't.
>> 
>> Testcase: kms_flip/basic-flip-vs-dpms
>> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93768
>> Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobs...@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 40
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> index 8b9290fdb3b2..cb91540cfbad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> @@ -470,6 +470,42 @@ static void
>> gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask_memory_up(
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void gen9_write_dc_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> +                            u32 state)
>> +{
>> +    int rewrites = 0;
>> +    int rereads = 0;
>> +    u32 v;
>> +
>> +    I915_WRITE(DC_STATE_EN, state);
>> +
>> +    /* It has been observed that disabling the dc6 state
>> sometimes
>> +     * doesn't stick and dmc keeps returning old value. Make
>> sure
>> +     * the write really sticks enough times and also force
>> rewrite until
>> +     * we are confident that state is exactly what we want.
>> +     */
>> +    do  {
>> +            v = I915_READ(DC_STATE_EN);
>> +
>> +            if (v != state) {
>> +                    I915_WRITE(DC_STATE_EN, state);
>> +                    rewrites++;
>
> Could be rereads = 0; for extra paranoia. Either way:

Oh yes, extra paranoia in here is warranted. I will
add that.

> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>

Thanks,
-Mika

>
>> +            } else if (rereads++ > 5) {
>> +                    break;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +    } while (rewrites < 100);
>> +
>> +    if (v != state)
>> +            DRM_ERROR("Writing dc state to 0x%x failed, now
>> 0x%x\n",
>> +                      state, v);
>> +
>> +    /* Most of the times we need one retry, avoid spam */
>> +    if (rewrites > 1)
>> +            DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Rewrote dc state to 0x%x %d times\n",
>> +                          state, rewrites);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void gen9_set_dc_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> uint32_t state)
>>  {
>>      uint32_t val;
>> @@ -502,8 +538,8 @@ static void gen9_set_dc_state(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t state)
>>  
>>      val &= ~mask;
>>      val |= state;
>> -    I915_WRITE(DC_STATE_EN, val);
>> -    POSTING_READ(DC_STATE_EN);
>> +
>> +    gen9_write_dc_state(dev_priv, val);
>>  
>>      dev_priv->csr.dc_state = val & mask;
>>  }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to