On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:29:19AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -764,18 +764,18 @@ intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(struct 
> drm_i915_gem_request *request)
>  {
>       struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf = request->ringbuf;
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = request->i915;
> +     int i;
>  
>       intel_logical_ring_advance(ringbuf);
>       request->tail = ringbuf->tail;
>  
>       /*
> -      * Here we add two extra NOOPs as padding to avoid
> +      * Here we add extra NOOPs as padding to avoid
>        * lite restore of a context with HEAD==TAIL.
> -      *
> -      * Caller must reserve WA_TAIL_DWORDS for us!
>        */
> -     intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_NOOP);
> -     intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_NOOP);
> +     for (i = 0; i < ringbuf->wa_tail_dwords; i++)
> +             intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_NOOP);
> +
>       intel_logical_ring_advance(ringbuf);
>  
>       if (intel_ring_stopped(request->ring))
> @@ -876,6 +876,16 @@ int intel_logical_ring_begin(struct drm_i915_gem_request 
> *req, int num_dwords)
>       if (ret)
>               return ret;
>  
> +     if (IS_GEN8(req->ring->dev) || IS_GEN9(req->ring->dev))

req->i915

This is attrocious. Just allocate the extra space when required.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to