From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>

Return path from this function got confused in:

   commit 02f93c21e6e1c3dad9d99349989daa84a8c0b5fb
   Author: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net>
   Date:   Wed Jan 15 00:38:39 2014 -0800

   intel: Track whether a buffer is idle to avoid trips to the kernel.

Consolidate the return paths and stop leaking out the internal
driver state since the API was intended to be a boolean.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
index dc28200ffecc..2f8bad88166a 100644
--- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
+++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
@@ -663,11 +663,10 @@ drm_intel_gem_bo_busy(drm_intel_bo *bo)
        ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_BUSY, &busy);
        if (ret == 0) {
                bo_gem->idle = !busy.busy;
-               return busy.busy;
-       } else {
-               return false;
+               return !bo_gem->idle;
        }
-       return (ret == 0 && busy.busy);
+
+       return false;
 }
 
 static int
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to