On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 05:01:58PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > Pass BIT(DRM_ROTATE_0) instead of DRM_ROTATE_0 to skl_update_scaler(). > The former is a mask, the latter just the bit number. > > Fortunately the only thing skl_update_scaler() does with the rotation > is check if it's 90/270 degrees or not, and so in this case it would > still do the right thing. > > Cc: Chandra Konduru <chandra.kond...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Ping, anyone care to r-b this one? > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 7498c9d..02316d0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -4673,7 +4673,7 @@ int skl_update_scaler_crtc(struct intel_crtc_state > *state) > intel_crtc->base.base.id, intel_crtc->pipe, > SKL_CRTC_INDEX); > > return skl_update_scaler(state, !state->base.active, SKL_CRTC_INDEX, > - &state->scaler_state.scaler_id, DRM_ROTATE_0, > + &state->scaler_state.scaler_id, BIT(DRM_ROTATE_0), > state->pipe_src_w, state->pipe_src_h, > adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay, adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay); > } > -- > 2.4.9 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
