On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:51:46PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Tvrtko was looking through the execbuffer-ioctl and noticed that the > uABI was tightly coupled to our internal engine identifiers. Close > inspection also revealed that we leak those internal engine identifiers > through the busy-ioctl, and those internal identifiers already do not > match the user identifiers. Fortuitiously, there is only one user of the > set of busy rings from the busy-ioctl, and they only wish to choose > between the RENDER and the BLT engines. > > Let's fix the userspace ABI while we still can. > > v2: Update the uAPI documentation to explain the identifiers.
Testcase: igt/gem_busy > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
