On 11/01/16 16:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:16:16PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Don't know, I leave this one to whoever grabbed the lock around
intel_init_gt_powersave in the first place. Maybe there was a special
reason.. after git blame od intel_display.c eventually completed, adding
Imre and Ville to cc.

Hmm. I don't recall the details anymore, but looking at the code pushing
the locking down to valleyview_setup_pctx() looks entirely reasonable to
me.

iirc, this locking only exists to keep the WARN() at bay. But it is
pedagogical, I guess.

Don't really know this area, but what about the intel_gen6_powersave_work->valleyview_enable_rps->valleyview_check_pctx which dereferences the dev_priv->vlv_pctx, which is set/cleared in valleyview_setup_pctx/valleyview_cleanup_pctx, which would now be outside both struct_mutex and the rps lock?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to