We only want to retire requests if we have an existing object that
conflicts with the fresh userptr range in order to avoid unnecessary
work during creation of every userptr.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
index a90392246471..2f922392bd10 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -187,17 +187,23 @@ i915_mmu_notifier_add(struct drm_device *dev,
         * using an interrupt timer is likely to get stuck in an EINTR loop).
         */
        mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-
-       /* Make sure we drop the final active reference (and thereby
-        * remove the objects from the interval tree) before we do
-        * the check for overlapping objects.
-        */
-       i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
-
        spin_lock(&mn->lock);
        it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects,
                                      mo->it.start, mo->it.last);
        if (it) {
+               spin_unlock(&mn->lock);
+
+               /* Make sure we drop the final active reference (and thereby
+                * remove the objects from the interval tree) before we do
+                * the check for overlapping objects.
+                */
+               i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
+
+               spin_lock(&mn->lock);
+               it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects,
+                                             mo->it.start, mo->it.last);
+       }
+       if (it) {
                struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 
                /* We only need to check the first object in the range as it
-- 
2.7.0.rc3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to