On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:16:54PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On 01/04/2016 12:57 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:20:44AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> So this one has my ack. > > > > This series makes a number of fundamental mistakes in seqno-interrupt > > handling, so no. > > Well unless you can enumerate the issues in enough detail for us to address > them, we don't have much choice but to go ahead. I know you've replied to a > few of these threads in the past, but I don't see a current list of > outstanding bugs aside from the one about modifying input params on the > execbuf error path (though the code comment seems to indicate some care is > being taken there at least, so should be a small fix).
Other than the series addressing the reported bugs which this is direct conflict with? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
