On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:49:27AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Yeah we definitely want this, but it'll have to be reconciled with the > different request->fence patches. I'm not sure if it would be easier to move > to per-context seqnos first or go this route and deal with the mismatch > between global and per-ctx.
This patch doesn't do independent per-context seqno, so the point is moot. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
