On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.srip...@intel.com> 
wrote:
> Original value of 32 blocks is not sufficient when using cursor size of
> 256x256 causing FIFO underruns when the reworked wm
> caluclations in
>
> commit 024c9045221fe45482863c47c4b4c47d37f97cbf
> Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
> Date:   Thu Sep 24 15:53:11 2015 -0700
>
>     drm/i915/skl: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from SKL-style WM (v4)
>
> are used. Increasing the number of blocks to 52 to make cursor plane tolerate
> SAGV block time for the maximum possible cursor size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.srip...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kalyan Kondapally <kalyan.kondapa...@intel.com>

Cc: drm-intel-fi...@lists.freedesktop.org

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index d385d99..137fb68 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2802,7 +2802,7 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device 
> *dev,
>  static unsigned int skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_wm_config 
> *config)
>  {
>       if (config->num_pipes_active == 1)
> -             return 32;
> +             return 52;
>  
>       return 8;
>  }

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to