On ti, 2015-12-15 at 20:10 +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > v2-v3: > - unchanged > v4: > - keep the corresponding check in the get helper (Chris)
This is put helper you patched, so I think the above message is incorrect. Regards, Joonas > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > index 29157fb..82c55a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > @@ -2282,6 +2282,7 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct > drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev; > struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev; > > + assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv); > atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count); > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(device); -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
