From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

LPT/WPT only have transcoder A, so we shouldn't look at FIFO underruns
for transocoder B/C. And more importnatnly we should not consider
the state of underrun reporting for transcoders B/C when checking
whether we can enable the south error interrupt.

The whole thing is a bit of mess since we store the underrun reporting
state for transcoder A under intel_crtc for pipe A, irrespective of
which pipe may actually be driving the transcoder. But I figured trying
to change that would result in more churn.

Caveat: Still untested

v2: Use HAS_PCH_LPT_H instead of HAS_DDI
    Use cpt_check_pch_fifo_underruns() on LPT-H/WPT-H too

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
index bda526660e20..3d3acc8b8367 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
@@ -48,6 +48,14 @@
  * The code also supports underrun detection on the PCH transcoder.
  */
 
+static bool cpt_transcoder_exists(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+                                 enum transcoder pch_transcoder)
+{
+       /* LPT-H/WPT-H have only transcoder A */
+       return HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv) ||
+               (HAS_PCH_LPT_H(dev_priv) && pch_transcoder == TRANSCODER_A);
+}
+
 static bool ivb_can_enable_err_int(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
@@ -69,13 +77,16 @@ static bool ivb_can_enable_err_int(struct drm_device *dev)
 static bool cpt_can_enable_serr_int(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
-       enum pipe pipe;
-       struct intel_crtc *crtc;
+       enum transcoder pch_transcoder;
 
        assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
 
-       for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
-               crtc = to_intel_crtc(dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]);
+       for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pch_transcoder) {
+               struct intel_crtc *crtc =
+                       
to_intel_crtc(dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pch_transcoder]);
+
+               if (!cpt_transcoder_exists(dev_priv, pch_transcoder))
+                       continue;
 
                if (crtc->pch_fifo_underrun_disabled)
                        return false;
@@ -206,6 +217,9 @@ static void cpt_check_pch_fifo_underruns(struct intel_crtc 
*crtc)
 
        assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
 
+       if (!cpt_transcoder_exists(dev_priv, pch_transcoder))
+               return;
+
        if ((serr_int & SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pch_transcoder)) == 0)
                return;
 
@@ -222,6 +236,9 @@ static void cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct 
drm_device *dev,
 {
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 
+       if (!cpt_transcoder_exists(dev_priv, pch_transcoder))
+               return;
+
        if (enable) {
                I915_WRITE(SERR_INT,
                           SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pch_transcoder));
@@ -436,7 +453,7 @@ void intel_check_pch_fifo_underruns(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv)
                if (crtc->pch_fifo_underrun_disabled)
                        continue;
 
-               if (HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv))
+               if (HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_LPT_H(dev_priv))
                        cpt_check_pch_fifo_underruns(crtc);
        }
 
-- 
2.4.10

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to