On 20/11/15 12:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
Perform s/ringbuf/ring/ on the context struct for consistency with the ring/engine split.Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++----------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 12 ++--- 5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index 56375c36b381..630717fec688 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -1950,7 +1950,7 @@ static int i915_context_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) struct drm_i915_gem_object *ctx_obj = ctx->engine[i].state; struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf =
Elsewhere you were renaming this to ring, why not here? I am not sure it makes sense (renaming) but it is at least not consistent.
Regards, Tvrtko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
