On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:55:34PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> If we experience a refcounting failure in a power domain/well (unref'ing at
> least one too many times), log the name of the offending domain or well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com>
Both patches look OK to me
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 754f9bd..7237dea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -1499,11 +1499,15 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
>
> mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
>
> - WARN_ON(!power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]);
> + WARN(!power_domains->domain_use_count[domain],
> + "Use count on domain %s is already zero\n",
> + intel_display_power_domain_str(domain));
> power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]--;
>
> for_each_power_well_rev(i, power_well, BIT(domain), power_domains) {
> - WARN_ON(!power_well->count);
> + WARN(!power_well->count,
> + "Use count on power well %s is already zero",
> + power_well->name);
>
> if (!--power_well->count)
> intel_power_well_disable(dev_priv, power_well);
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
