On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:40:45PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 06:40:34PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > In an upcoming patch we'll need the actual mask of slices in addition to
> > their count, so replace the count field with a mask.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 14 +++++++-------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 37
> > +++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
<snip>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > index 8a55f8a..4130ff1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > @@ -2202,7 +2202,7 @@ make_rpcs(struct drm_device *dev)
> > */
> > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->sseu.has_slice_pg) {
> > rpcs |= GEN8_RPCS_S_CNT_ENABLE;
> > - rpcs |= INTEL_INFO(dev)->sseu.slice_total <<
> > + rpcs |= hweight32(INTEL_INFO(dev)->sseu.slice_mask) <<
> ^ hweight8?
>
> > GEN8_RPCS_S_CNT_SHIFT;
> > rpcs |= GEN8_RPCS_ENABLE;
> > }
>
> I'm not positive if hweight32 is actually okay on an 8bit type. I remember
> Ville
> correcting me once on this, but I can't remember it's correct. Assuming
> hweight32 is fine to use, with or without my recommendations, this is:
> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com>
I think my hweight8() comment (w.r.t. some patches IIRC) was just an
idea for a micro-optimizition. C promotes small stuff to ints anyway
so I assume hweight32() is just fine functionally.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
