On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:41:34AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> From: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.ku...@intel.com>
> 
> If ddb allocation for planes in current CRTC is changed, that doesn't
> lead to ddb allocation change for other CRTCs, because our DDB allocation
> is not dynamic according to plane parameters, ddb is allocated according
> to number of CRTC enabled, & divided equally among CTRC's.
> 
> In current condition check during Watermark calculation, if number of
> plane/ddb allocation changes for current CRTC, Watermark for other pipes
> are recalculated. But there is no change in DDB allocation of other pipe
> so watermark is also not changed, This leads to warning messages.
> WARN_ON(!wm_changed)
> 
> This patch corrects this and check if DDB allocation for pipes is changed,
> then only recalculate watermarks.
> 
> v2 (by Matt): Rebased to latest -nightly and fixed a typo
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kumar, Mahesh <mahesh1.ku...@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by(v1): Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
> ---
> I don't think this solves all the !wm_changed warnings (I still see one during
> fbdev restore following various igt tests), but it seems like a move in the
> right direction so I figured I'd go ahead and rebase Mahesh' patch so it can
> get merged.

Merged to cut down on the noise (hopefully ...).
-Daniel

> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 12 +++++-------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 0fb0459..0467e34 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3064,14 +3064,12 @@ static bool skl_ddb_allocation_changed(const struct 
> skl_ddb_allocation *new_ddb,
>       struct drm_device *dev = intel_crtc->base.dev;
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>       const struct skl_ddb_allocation *cur_ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
> -     enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> -
> -     if (memcmp(new_ddb->plane[pipe], cur_ddb->plane[pipe],
> -                sizeof(new_ddb->plane[pipe])))
> -             return true;
>  
> -     if (memcmp(&new_ddb->plane[pipe][PLANE_CURSOR], 
> &cur_ddb->plane[pipe][PLANE_CURSOR],
> -                 sizeof(new_ddb->plane[pipe][PLANE_CURSOR])))
> +     /*
> +      * If ddb allocation of pipes changed, it may require recalculation of
> +      * watermarks
> +      */
> +     if (memcmp(new_ddb->pipe, cur_ddb->pipe, sizeof(new_ddb->pipe)))
>               return true;
>  
>       return false;
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to