Hi Paulo, On 4 November 2015 at 19:10, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> wrote: > So Ville pointed a problem on patch 02/26 of the previous series, and the nice > fix for that would make me rebase most of the subsequent patches. In order to > avoid blocking the other patches on the review of patch 02 and in order to > avoid > having to rebase everything again and again during this I decided to change > the > order of the patches on the series and try to get a smaller chunk of patches > merged before moving on to the others. > > These first 13 patches are somewhat trivial and are mostly just moving code > around, with only one or two simple bug fixes. If you wonder why some of these > changes are needed, please go check the complete series (the short answer is: > most of the changes are needed for the new model with enable/disable + > activate/deactivate). > > After all these patches are merged I'll resend the rest.
This series is missing 01/26 of your previous series (make no_fbc_reason a string). Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
