On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > The regressing patch change didn't add the message, so there was a clear > change in behaviour, and now it's papered over.
It did move around the DRM_ERROR for all the others and also added the SDE one for consistency. At least that's how I read that patch - I could't find the SDE DRM_ERROR in the old code. Did I miss something? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
