Hi,

On 22/10/15 02:24, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
The main goal of this subtest is to verify whether flipping a

Need to change to commit message since there is no flipping involved.

framebuffer with a Y fb modifier (90/270 degree rotation) and
with an associated Y-tiled object works or not.

And also explain in more detail the requirement to not have a normal VMA before the rotated one is displayed.

v2: Do not call paint_squares and just use one output.

Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasire...@intel.com>
---
  tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
index cc9847e..63f27f8 100644
--- a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
+++ b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
@@ -264,6 +264,73 @@ static void test_plane_rotation(data_t *data, enum 
igt_plane plane_type)
        igt_require_f(valid_tests, "no valid crtc/connector combinations 
found\n");
  }

+static void test_plane_rotation_ytiled_obj(data_t *data, enum igt_plane 
plane_type)
+{
+       igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
+       uint64_t tiling = LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED;
+       uint32_t format = DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
+       int bpp = igt_drm_format_to_bpp(format);
+       enum igt_commit_style commit = COMMIT_LEGACY;
+       int fd = data->gfx_fd;
+       int valid_tests = 0;
+       igt_output_t *output = &display->outputs[0];
+       int ret;
+
+       if (plane_type == IGT_PLANE_PRIMARY || plane_type == IGT_PLANE_CURSOR) {
+               igt_require(data->display.has_universal_planes);
+               commit = COMMIT_UNIVERSAL;
+       }
+
+       if (output && output->valid) {

How about getting rid of this indentation level and valid_tests by just doing igt_require on the condition above?

+               igt_plane_t *plane;
+               drmModeModeInfo *mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
+               unsigned int w = mode->hdisplay;
+               unsigned int h = mode->vdisplay;
+               unsigned int stride, size;
+               uint32_t gem_handle;
+
+               for (stride = 512; stride < (w * bpp / 8); stride *= 2)
+                       ;
+               for (size = 1024*1024; size < stride * h; size *= 2)
+                       ;
+
+               gem_handle = gem_create(fd, size);
+               ret = __gem_set_tiling(fd, gem_handle, I915_TILING_Y, stride);
+               igt_assert(ret == 0);
+
+               do_or_die(__kms_addfb(fd, gem_handle, w, h, stride,
+                         format, tiling, LOCAL_DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS,
+                         &data->fb.fb_id));
+               data->fb.width = w;
+               data->fb.height = h;
+               data->fb.gem_handle = gem_handle;
+
+               plane = igt_output_get_plane(output, plane_type);
+               igt_require(igt_plane_supports_rotation(plane));

This would maybe be cleaner above the fb allocation, to group all the asserts together.

Otherwise looks fine to me.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to