On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:07:41PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:24:41PM -0700, Kevin Strasser wrote: > > On HSW the crc differs between black and disabled primary planes, causing an > > assert to fail in the kms_universal_plane test. It seems that things like > > gamma > > correction are causing the black primary plane case to result in a brighter > > color than the disabled primary plane case. > > > > Only toggle the enable bit instead of clearing the control register, making > > the > > disable path more similar to that of the sprite plane. > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89331 > > Testcase: igt/kms_universal_plane > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Strasser <kevin.stras...@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > index cddb0c6..b6164d8e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > @@ -2829,7 +2829,7 @@ static void ironlake_update_primary_plane(struct > > drm_crtc *crtc, > > int pixel_size; > > > > if (!visible || !fb) { > > - I915_WRITE(reg, 0); > > + I915_WRITE(reg, I915_READ(reg) & ~DISPLAY_PLANE_ENABLE); > > Eh, what now? We've been trying to eliminate these nasty RMWs. > > Are you saying that if we disabled the plane, but leave the "pass plane > data through gamma" it still affects the output for any pixel "covered" > by the disabled plane?
What I thought was being said was that if a plane is set to black (but with gamma enabled on the pipe) then a different CRC is produced compared to when the pipe is completely disabled (no plane at all). It sounded to me like a test case failure. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
