On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 07:19:16PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> gem_mmap__{cpu,gtt,wc}() already has the assert built in, so replace
> __gem_mmap__{cpu,gtt,wc}() + igt_assert() with it.
>
> Mostly done with coccinelle, with some manual help:
> @@
> identifier I;
> expression E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6;
> @@
> (
> - I = __gem_mmap__gtt(E1, E2, E3, E4);
> + I = gem_mmap__gtt(E1, E2, E3, E4);
> ...
> - igt_assert(I);
> |
> - I = __gem_mmap__cpu(E1, E2, E3, E4, E5);
> + I = gem_mmap__cpu(E1, E2, E3, E4, E5);
> ...
> - igt_assert(I);
> |
> - I = __gem_mmap__wc(E1, E2, E3, E4, E5);
> + I = gem_mmap__wc(E1, E2, E3, E4, E5);
> ...
> - igt_assert(I);
> )
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Looks like by the end we miss a few asserts (a few too many __gem_mmap
left over), but that is just a continuation of the state of affairs.
Series lgtm,
Stochastically-reviwewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
