Hi,
On 07/10/15 03:35, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
This new subtest will validate a Y-tiled object's tiling mode against
its associated fb modifier.
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasire...@intel.com>
---
tests/kms_addfb_basic.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c b/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c
index d466e4d..7ca1add 100644
--- a/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c
+++ b/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c
@@ -373,6 +373,15 @@ static void addfb25_ytile(int fd, int gen)
f.handles[0] = gem_bo;
}
+ igt_subtest("addfb25-Y-tiled-X-modifier-mismatch") {
+ igt_require(gen >= 9);
+ igt_require_fb_modifiers(fd);
+ gem_set_tiling(fd, gem_bo, I915_TILING_Y, 1024*4);
+
+ f.modifier[0] = LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED;
+ igt_assert(drmIoctl(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2, &f) < 0 &&
errno == EINVAL);
+ }
+
igt_subtest("addfb25-Y-tiled") {
igt_require_fb_modifiers(fd);
Wasn't the original WARN triggered by Y tiled object and Y fb modifier?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
