Jesse,

Will the patch here fix the issue? It should help other cases where LRC_PPHWSP_PN is referenced on non-execlist / guc platforms.

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
index 4cc54b3..233a930 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static inline void intel_logical_ring_emit(struct 
intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf,

 /* One extra page is added before LRC for GuC as shared data */
 #define LRC_GUCSHR_PN  (0)
-#define LRC_PPHWSP_PN  (LRC_GUCSHR_PN + 1)
+#define LRC_PPHWSP_PN  (LRC_GUCSHR_PN + i915.enable_guc_submission ? 1 : 0)
 #define LRC_STATE_PN   (LRC_PPHWSP_PN + 1)

 void intel_lr_context_free(struct intel_context *ctx);

Thanks,
Alex

On 09/10/2015 02:40 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Looks like this was introduced in:
commit d1675198ed1f21aec6e036336e4340c40b726497
Author: Alex Dai <yu....@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Aug 12 15:43:43 2015 +0100

     drm/i915: Integrate GuC-based command submission

This patch assumed LRC contexts and HWS layout, which is incorrect on
platforms without execlists.  This can lead to a crash in GPU error
state readout on those platforms.

I don't see a bug filed for this, but there may be one that I haven't
found.

Cc: Alex Dai <yu....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
index 3379f9c..d0822f8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
@@ -457,17 +457,24 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct 
drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
                }
if ((obj = error->ring[i].hws_page)) {
+                       u64 hws_offset = lower_32_bits(obj->gtt_offset);
+                       u32 *hws_page = &obj->pages[0][0];
+
+                       if (i915.enable_execlists) {
+                               hws_offset = obj->gtt_offset + LRC_PPHWSP_PN *
+                                       PAGE_SIZE;
+                               hws_page = &obj->pages[LRC_PPHWSP_PN][0];
+                       }
                        err_printf(m, "%s --- HW Status = 0x%08llx\n",
-                               dev_priv->ring[i].name,
-                               obj->gtt_offset + LRC_PPHWSP_PN * PAGE_SIZE);
+                                  dev_priv->ring[i].name, hws_offset);
                        offset = 0;
                        for (elt = 0; elt < PAGE_SIZE/16; elt += 4) {
                                err_printf(m, "[%04x] %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
                                           offset,
-                                          obj->pages[LRC_PPHWSP_PN][elt],
-                                          obj->pages[LRC_PPHWSP_PN][elt+1],
-                                          obj->pages[LRC_PPHWSP_PN][elt+2],
-                                          obj->pages[LRC_PPHWSP_PN][elt+3]);
+                                          hws_page[elt],
+                                          hws_page[elt+1],
+                                          hws_page[elt+2],
+                                          hws_page[elt+3]);
                                        offset += 16;
                        }
                }

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to