>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nikula, Jani
>Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 6:04 PM
>To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>Cc: R, Durgadoss
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: add common intel_digital_port_connected
>function
>
>On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> wrote:
>> Add a common intel_digital_port_connected() that splits out to functions
>> for different platforms. No functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 53
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index 4aa3d664765b..d48af8b0c84e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -4473,15 +4473,8 @@ edp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> return status;
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * ibx_digital_port_connected - is the specified port connected?
>> - * @dev_priv: i915 private structure
>> - * @port: the port to test
>> - *
>> - * Returns true if @port is connected, false otherwise.
>> - */
>> -static bool ibx_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> - struct intel_digital_port *port)
>> +static int ibx_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> + struct intel_digital_port *port)
>> {
>> u32 bit;
>>
>> @@ -4497,7 +4490,7 @@ static bool ibx_digital_port_connected(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> bit = SDE_PORTD_HOTPLUG;
>> break;
>> default:
>> - return true;
>> + return 1;
>> }
>> } else {
>> switch (port->port) {
>> @@ -4511,20 +4504,19 @@ static bool ibx_digital_port_connected(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> bit = SDE_PORTD_HOTPLUG_CPT;
>> break;
>> default:
>> - return true;
>> + return 1;
>
>BTW a follow-up could look into making the ibx/cpt default cases return
>-EINVAL like the g4x/vlv/bxt cases do.
But the default case for ibx/cpt currently return 1 .. meaning "connected"
as default result.. In this case, by returning -EINVAL,
won't we break existing users ?
or,
Can we add a WARN_ON()/MISSING_CASE() and then return -EINVAL ?
Thanks,
Durga
>
>BR,
>Jani.
>
>
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - return I915_READ(SDEISR) & bit;
>> + return I915_READ(SDEISR) & bit ? 1 : 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int g4x_digital_port_connected(struct drm_device *dev,
>> - struct intel_digital_port
>> *intel_dig_port)
>> +static int g4x_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port)
>> {
>> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> uint32_t bit;
>>
>> - if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
>> + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>> switch (intel_dig_port->port) {
>> case PORT_B:
>> bit = PORTB_HOTPLUG_LIVE_STATUS_VLV;
>> @@ -4559,6 +4551,22 @@ static int g4x_digital_port_connected(struct
>> drm_device *dev,
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * intel_digital_port_connected - is the specified port connected?
>> + * @dev_priv: i915 private structure
>> + * @port: the port to test
>> + *
>> + * Returns a negative error code on errors, 1 for connected, 0 for
>> disconnected.
>> + */
>> +static int intel_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> + struct intel_digital_port *port)
>> +{
>> + if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
>> + return ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
>> + else
>> + return g4x_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
>> +}
>> +
>> static enum drm_connector_status
>> ironlake_dp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> {
>> @@ -4566,7 +4574,7 @@ ironlake_dp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>>
>> - if (!ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port))
>> + if (intel_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port) != 1)
>> return connector_status_disconnected;
>>
>> return intel_dp_detect_dpcd(intel_dp);
>> @@ -4589,7 +4597,7 @@ g4x_dp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> return status;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = g4x_digital_port_connected(dev, intel_dig_port);
>> + ret = intel_digital_port_connected(dev->dev_private, intel_dig_port);
>> if (ret == -EINVAL)
>> return connector_status_unknown;
>> else if (ret == 0)
>> @@ -5055,13 +5063,8 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port
>> *intel_dig_port, bool
>long_hpd)
>> /* indicate that we need to restart link training */
>> intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
>>
>> - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
>> - if (!ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv,
>> intel_dig_port))
>> - goto mst_fail;
>> - } else {
>> - if (g4x_digital_port_connected(dev, intel_dig_port) !=
>> 1)
>> - goto mst_fail;
>> - }
>> + if (intel_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port) != 1)
>> + goto mst_fail;
>>
>> if (!intel_dp_get_dpcd(intel_dp)) {
>> goto mst_fail;
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>>
>
>--
>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
