On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 02:28:55PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> commit 75067ddecf21271631bc018d2fb23ddd09b66aae
> Author: Antti Koskipaa <antti.koski...@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Fri Jul 10 14:10:55 2015 +0300
>
> drm/i915: Per-DDI I_boost override
>
> increased size of union child_device_config without taking into account
> the size check in parse_sdvo_device_mapping(). Switch the function over
> to using the legacy struct only.
>
> Fixes: 75067ddecf21 ("drm/i915: Per-DDI I_boost override")
> Cc: Antti Koskipaa <antti.koski...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: David Weinehall <david.weineh...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Also gave it a spin on my 946gz so:
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 50
> +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> index 8e46149bafdd..1b7e1a591a37 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ parse_sdvo_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> {
> struct sdvo_device_mapping *p_mapping;
> const struct bdb_general_definitions *p_defs;
> - const union child_device_config *p_child;
> + const struct old_child_dev_config *child; /* legacy */
> int i, child_device_num, count;
> u16 block_size;
>
> @@ -410,14 +410,14 @@ parse_sdvo_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No general definition block is found, unable to
> construct sdvo mapping.\n");
> return;
> }
> - /* judge whether the size of child device meets the requirements.
> - * If the child device size obtained from general definition block
> - * is different with sizeof(struct child_device_config), skip the
> - * parsing of sdvo device info
> +
> + /*
> + * Only parse SDVO mappings when the general definitions block child
> + * device size matches that of the *legacy* child device config
> + * struct. Thus, SDVO mapping will be skipped for newer VBT.
> */
> - if (p_defs->child_dev_size != sizeof(*p_child)) {
> - /* different child dev size . Ignore it */
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("different child size is found. Invalid.\n");
> + if (p_defs->child_dev_size != sizeof(*child)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported child device size for SDVO
> mapping.\n");
> return;
> }
> /* get the block size of general definitions */
> @@ -427,37 +427,37 @@ parse_sdvo_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> p_defs->child_dev_size;
> count = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < child_device_num; i++) {
> - p_child = child_device_ptr(p_defs, i);
> - if (!p_child->old.device_type) {
> + child = &child_device_ptr(p_defs, i)->old;
> + if (!child->device_type) {
> /* skip the device block if device type is invalid */
> continue;
> }
> - if (p_child->old.slave_addr != SLAVE_ADDR1 &&
> - p_child->old.slave_addr != SLAVE_ADDR2) {
> + if (child->slave_addr != SLAVE_ADDR1 &&
> + child->slave_addr != SLAVE_ADDR2) {
> /*
> * If the slave address is neither 0x70 nor 0x72,
> * it is not a SDVO device. Skip it.
> */
> continue;
> }
> - if (p_child->old.dvo_port != DEVICE_PORT_DVOB &&
> - p_child->old.dvo_port != DEVICE_PORT_DVOC) {
> + if (child->dvo_port != DEVICE_PORT_DVOB &&
> + child->dvo_port != DEVICE_PORT_DVOC) {
> /* skip the incorrect SDVO port */
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Incorrect SDVO port. Skip it\n");
> continue;
> }
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("the SDVO device with slave addr %2x is found on"
> - " %s port\n",
> - p_child->old.slave_addr,
> - (p_child->old.dvo_port == DEVICE_PORT_DVOB) ?
> - "SDVOB" : "SDVOC");
> - p_mapping = &(dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[p_child->old.dvo_port -
> 1]);
> + " %s port\n",
> + child->slave_addr,
> + (child->dvo_port == DEVICE_PORT_DVOB) ?
> + "SDVOB" : "SDVOC");
> + p_mapping = &(dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[child->dvo_port - 1]);
> if (!p_mapping->initialized) {
> - p_mapping->dvo_port = p_child->old.dvo_port;
> - p_mapping->slave_addr = p_child->old.slave_addr;
> - p_mapping->dvo_wiring = p_child->old.dvo_wiring;
> - p_mapping->ddc_pin = p_child->old.ddc_pin;
> - p_mapping->i2c_pin = p_child->old.i2c_pin;
> + p_mapping->dvo_port = child->dvo_port;
> + p_mapping->slave_addr = child->slave_addr;
> + p_mapping->dvo_wiring = child->dvo_wiring;
> + p_mapping->ddc_pin = child->ddc_pin;
> + p_mapping->i2c_pin = child->i2c_pin;
> p_mapping->initialized = 1;
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("SDVO device: dvo=%x, addr=%x, wiring=%d,
> ddc_pin=%d, i2c_pin=%d\n",
> p_mapping->dvo_port,
> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ parse_sdvo_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Maybe one SDVO port is shared by "
> "two SDVO device.\n");
> }
> - if (p_child->old.slave2_addr) {
> + if (child->slave2_addr) {
> /* Maybe this is a SDVO device with multiple inputs */
> /* And the mapping info is not added */
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("there exists the slave2_addr. Maybe this"
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
