> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 01:37:49PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > > On 13.08.2015 13:36, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > > > On 13.08.2015 13:00, Xiong Zhang wrote: > > >> Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zh...@intel.com> > > >> --- > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 1 + > > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > >> index 65cc5b1..801187c 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > >> @@ -1100,6 +1100,7 @@ bool ibx_digital_port_connected(struct > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > >> break; > > >> case PORT_E: > > >> bit = SDE_PORTE_HOTPLUG_SPT; > > >> + break; > > >> default: > > >> return true; > > >> } > > >> > > > > > > shouldn't this belong to [5/6]? > > > > Nevermind, I see now that it got merged already. > > I dropped that patch again so that we can rectify this properly. Jani's > complaint > about the sub-par commit message still holds though, like why was this not > caught in testing? [Zhang, Xiong Y] Yes, it's better to drop it. I will explain it the commit message and resent the patch. > -Daniel
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
