On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:30 PM Paulo Zanoni <przan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
>
> Due to the way busy_bits was handled, we were not doing any flushes if
> we didn't previously get an invalidate. Since it's possible to get
> flushes without an invalidate first, remove the busy_bits early
> return.
>
> So now that we don't have the busy_bits guard anymore we'll need the
> origin check for the GTT tracking (we were not doing anything on GTT
> flushes due to the GTT check at invalidate()).
>
> As a last detail, since we can get multiple consecutive flushes,
> disable FBC before updating it, otherwise intel_fbc_update() will just
> keep FBC enabled instead of restarting it.
>
> Notice that this does not fix any of the current IGT tests due to the
> fact that we still have a few intel_fbc() calls at points where we
> also have the frontbuffer tracking calls: we didn't fully convert to
> frontbuffer tracking yet. Once we remove those calls and start relying
> only on the frontbuffer tracking infrastructure we'll need this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 13 +++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index f4abce1..2437666 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ void intel_fbc_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> unsigned int frontbuffer_bits,
> enum fb_op_origin origin);
> void intel_fbc_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - unsigned int frontbuffer_bits);
> + unsigned int frontbuffer_bits, enum fb_op_origin
> origin);
> const char *intel_no_fbc_reason_str(enum no_fbc_reason reason);
> void intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> index c271af7..1f97fb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> @@ -884,22 +884,23 @@ void intel_fbc_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> }
>
> void intel_fbc_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - unsigned int frontbuffer_bits)
> + unsigned int frontbuffer_bits, enum fb_op_origin
> origin)
> {
> if (!dev_priv->fbc.enable_fbc)
> return;
>
> - mutex_lock(&dev_priv->fbc.lock);
> + if (origin == ORIGIN_GTT)
> + return;
>
> - if (!dev_priv->fbc.busy_bits)
> - goto out;
> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->fbc.lock);
>
> dev_priv->fbc.busy_bits &= ~frontbuffer_bits;
>
> - if (!dev_priv->fbc.busy_bits)
> + if (!dev_priv->fbc.busy_bits) {
> + __intel_fbc_disable(dev_priv);
> __intel_fbc_update(dev_priv);
>
are we going to kill fbc_update for good? ;)
But yes, we need to force the disable on flush so this is good.
I'd just add in a separated patch, but anyway feel free to use
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> + }
>
> -out:
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->fbc.lock);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c
> index 777b1d3..ac85357 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static void intel_frontbuffer_flush(struct drm_device
> *dev,
>
> intel_edp_drrs_flush(dev, frontbuffer_bits);
> intel_psr_flush(dev, frontbuffer_bits, origin);
> - intel_fbc_flush(dev_priv, frontbuffer_bits);
> + intel_fbc_flush(dev_priv, frontbuffer_bits, origin);
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
