On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:29:37PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 01:43:11AM -0700, shuang...@intel.com wrote:
> > Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: 
> > shuang...@intel.com)
> > Task id: 6873
> > -------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
> > Platform          Delta          drm-intel-nightly          Series Applied
> > ILK                                  297/297              297/297
> > SNB                                  315/315              315/315
> > IVB                                  342/342              342/342
> > BYT                 -1              284/284              283/284
> > HSW                                  378/378              378/378
> > -------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
> > Platform  Test                                drm-intel-nightly          
> > Series Applied
> > *BYT  igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@reads      PASS(1)      FAIL(1)
> > Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'
> 
> The original message went astry, but I read through it on patchwork and
> it really is just dead code elimination.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> I felt the changelog was a little vague (I didn't understand the "really
> no users left" comment), so I wouldn't mind if you tighten it up a bit!

Done a bit of clarification and pushed to dinq, thanks for the review. And
yay for mailer delay ...
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to