Op 21-07-15 om 13:35 schreef Chris Wilson: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:57:50PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Now that intel_display_suspend is atomic it's safe to remove >> wait_for_pending_flips from intel_crtc_disable_noatomic. It >> will only be used during hw load or resume, in which case there >> will be no pending flips anyway. > A WARN_ON(pending_flip) then? (Actually we should start doing > DRM_ERROR_ON I guess that would make a lot of complaints go away, and > also a lot of genuine bug reports) Or do we have warning coverage > elsewhere along the CRTC change path?
intel_sanitize_crtc, called during hw readout, is the only caller of intel_crtc_disable_noatomic. During hw readout no sw updates should be queued anyway.. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
