On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:24:19PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:19:09PM +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote: > > When reading the timestamp register with single 64b read, we are observing > > invalid values on x86_64: > > > > [f = valid counter value | X = garbage] > > > > i386: 0x0000000fffffffff > > x86_64: 0xffffffffXXXXXXXX > > > > Test checks if the counter is moving and increasing. > > Add a check to see if we can use (reg | 1) flag to get a proper 36b > > timestamp, > > shifting the value on x86_64 if we can't. > > > > v2: More iterations of monotonic test, comments, minor fixups (Chris) > > v3: Skip tests if reg_read is not supported > > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com> > > Lgtm, > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Pushed! thanks for the patch and review. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
