On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 10:32:11AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 10:25:17AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:09:25AM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > > > Now when we have requests this deep on call chain, we can mark > > > the elsp being submitted when it actually is. Remove temp variable > > > and readjust commenting to more closely fit to the code. > > > > > > v2: Avoid tmp variable and reduce number of writes (Chris) > > > > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com> > > > > Looks cleaner to me, > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > In fact, nothing in the series scared me and with the two minor changes, > might as well apply that r-b to the whole series. For the benefit of > others, can you repost the contracted series with my r-b applied?
Yeah maybe this was a bit too much splitting but I didn't find it too much so just went ahead and applied it all. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
