On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 06:38:39PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> This helps debugging.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index da7aa0f..ff5eb05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -1190,7 +1190,8 @@ found:
> }
>
> if (min_dco_index > 2) {
> - WARN(1, "No valid values found for the given pixel clock\n");
> + WARN(1, "No valid parameters found for pixel clock: %dHz\n",
> + clock);
Same complaint here, this should return false and get forwarded eventually
to haswell_crtc_compute_clock. I'll leave patch 2&3 for now since they
need to be reworked anyway.
-Daniel
> } else {
> wrpll_params->central_freq = dco_central_freq[min_dco_index];
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
