On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:03:09AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2015, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > chv_enable_pll() doesn't need to hold sb_lock for the entire duration of
> > the function. Drop the lock as soon as possible.
> >
> > valleyview_set_cdclk() does a potential lock+unlock+lock+unlock cycle
> > with sb_lock. Move Grab the lock a few lines earlier so we can make do
> 
> Move Grab?

Fixed and both patches applied, thanks.
-Daniel

> 
> Anyway, both patches are
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> 
> 
> > with a single lock+unlock cycle always.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 72b6529..067b1de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -1668,6 +1668,8 @@ static void chv_enable_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >     tmp |= DPIO_DCLKP_EN;
> >     vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_CMN_DW14(port), tmp);
> >  
> > +   mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> > +
> >     /*
> >      * Need to wait > 100ns between dclkp clock enable bit and PLL enable.
> >      */
> > @@ -1683,8 +1685,6 @@ static void chv_enable_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >     /* not sure when this should be written */
> >     I915_WRITE(DPLL_MD(pipe), pipe_config->dpll_hw_state.dpll_md);
> >     POSTING_READ(DPLL_MD(pipe));
> > -
> > -   mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int intel_num_dvo_pipes(struct drm_device *dev)
> > @@ -5780,12 +5780,13 @@ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device 
> > *dev, int cdclk)
> >     }
> >     mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >  
> > +   mutex_lock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> > +
> >     if (cdclk == 400000) {
> >             u32 divider;
> >  
> >             divider = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dev_priv->hpll_freq << 1, cdclk) - 
> > 1;
> >  
> > -           mutex_lock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> >             /* adjust cdclk divider */
> >             val = vlv_cck_read(dev_priv, CCK_DISPLAY_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> >             val &= ~DISPLAY_FREQUENCY_VALUES;
> > @@ -5796,10 +5797,8 @@ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device 
> > *dev, int cdclk)
> >                           DISPLAY_FREQUENCY_STATUS) == (divider << 
> > DISPLAY_FREQUENCY_STATUS_SHIFT),
> >                          50))
> >                     DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for CDclk change\n");
> > -           mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> >     }
> >  
> > -   mutex_lock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> >     /* adjust self-refresh exit latency value */
> >     val = vlv_bunit_read(dev_priv, BUNIT_REG_BISOC);
> >     val &= ~0x7f;
> > @@ -5813,6 +5812,7 @@ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device 
> > *dev, int cdclk)
> >     else
> >             val |= 3000 / 250; /* 3.0 usec */
> >     vlv_bunit_write(dev_priv, BUNIT_REG_BISOC, val);
> > +
> >     mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> >  
> >     vlv_update_cdclk(dev);
> > -- 
> > 2.3.6
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to