> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of > Damien Lespiau > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 8:13 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/skl: Replace BUG() by > MISSING_CASE() in skl_plane_ctl_format() > > Let's be consistent with the others skl_plane_ctl_*() functions and use a > MISSING_CASE(). Not only that, but it's a rude to BUG() the whole machine > here. > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index e2b01d9..49d7227 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -2997,7 +2997,7 @@ u32 skl_plane_ctl_format(uint32_t pixel_format) > format = PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_YUV422 | > PLANE_CTL_YUV422_VYUY; > break; > default: > - BUG(); > + MISSING_CASE(pixel_format); When I split update_plane into functions, I simply carried what was there. But agree that it should be a BUG.
Reviewed-by: Chandra Konduru <chandra.kond...@intel.com> > } > > return format; > -- > 2.1.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
