We never pass a non-NULL vbt to validate_vbt, and we can safely expect
the callers to not change.

Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
index cbd16c01959a..d39c41cf45a7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
@@ -1207,11 +1207,6 @@ static const struct bdb_header *validate_vbt(const void 
*base, size_t size,
        size_t offset;
        const struct bdb_header *bdb;
 
-       if (vbt == NULL) {
-               DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("VBT signature missing\n");
-               return NULL;
-       }
-
        offset = _vbt - base;
        if (offset + sizeof(struct vbt_header) > size) {
                DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("VBT header incomplete\n");
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to