On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:02:08PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> Specifically csr mutex lock is to protect csr-related data structures
> so declaration moved intel_csr structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.ma...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kam...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c | 12 ++++++------
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> index a238889..78e6ae8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned
> long flags)
> spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->mmio_flip_lock);
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->modeset_restore_lock);
> - mutex_init(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> + mutex_init(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
>
> intel_pm_setup(dev);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 136d42a..43011d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -676,6 +676,9 @@ enum csr_state {
> };
>
> struct intel_csr {
> + /* CSR protection, used to protect firmware loading status: csr_state */
> + struct mutex csr_lock;
csr_ prefix is redundant. But the real trouble is that essentially your
open-coding a completion using this mutex and csr->state. And that's just
confusing compared to using completions directly. Can you please replace
the usage of csr->state with a completion and remove the mutex entirely?
-Daniel
> +
> const char *fw_path;
> __be32 *dmc_payload;
> uint32_t dmc_fw_size;
> @@ -1592,9 +1595,6 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>
> struct intel_csr csr;
>
> - /* Display CSR-related protection */
> - struct mutex csr_lock;
> -
> struct intel_gmbus gmbus[GMBUS_NUM_PINS];
>
> /** gmbus_mutex protects against concurrent usage of the single hw gmbus
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> index 174106f..b03b9b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> @@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ enum csr_state intel_csr_load_status_get(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> enum csr_state state;
>
> - mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
> state = dev_priv->csr.state;
> - mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
>
> return state;
> }
> @@ -212,9 +212,9 @@ enum csr_state intel_csr_load_status_get(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> void intel_csr_load_status_set(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum csr_state state)
> {
> - mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
> dev_priv->csr.state = state;
> - mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void intel_csr_load_program(struct drm_device *dev)
> return;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
> fw_size = dev_priv->csr.dmc_fw_size;
> for (i = 0; i < fw_size; i++)
> I915_WRITE(CSR_PROGRAM_BASE + i * 4,
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void intel_csr_load_program(struct drm_device *dev)
> }
>
> dev_priv->csr.state = FW_LOADED;
> - mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
> }
>
> static void finish_csr_load(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
> --
> 2.0.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
