On 5/7/2015 2:11 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:52:09AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote:
BXT supports following intermediate link rates for edp:
2.16GHz, 2.43GHz, 3.24GHz, 4.32GHz.
Adding support for programming the intermediate rates.

Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jin...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  |    7 +++++-
  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index 9c1e74a..c0cb5f7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -1397,8 +1397,7 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
                        clk_div.lanestagger = 0x04;
                else
                        clk_div.lanestagger = 0x02;
-       } else if (intel_encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT ||
-                       intel_encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) {
+       } else if (intel_encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT) {
                struct drm_encoder *encoder = &intel_encoder->base;
                struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);

@@ -1416,8 +1415,49 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
                        clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[0];
                        DRM_ERROR("Unknown link rate\n");
                }
+       } else if (intel_encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) {
+               struct drm_encoder *encoder = &intel_encoder->base;
+               struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
+               int link_rate;
+
+               /*
+                * If edp1.4 intermediate frequency support is present, we set
+                * link_bw to 0 and a valid rate index in rate_select.
+                */
+               if (intel_dp->link_bw)
+                       link_rate = 
drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(intel_dp->link_bw);
+               else
+                       link_rate = intel_dp->sink_rates[intel_dp->rate_select];

The chosen clock should already be passed in, so no there should be no
need for this. I see the DP case does has the same issue.
Yes it was copied from DP :)


+
+               switch (link_rate) {
+               case 162000:
+                       clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[0];
+                       break;
+               case 216000:
+                       clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[3];
+                       break;
+               case 243000:
+                       clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[4];
+                       break;
+               case 270000:
+                       clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[1];
+                       break;
+               case 324000:
+                       clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[5];
+                       break;
+               case 432000:
+                       clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[6];
+                       break;
+               case 540000:
+                       clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[2];
+                       break;
+               default:
+                       clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[0];
+                       DRM_ERROR("Unknown link rate\n");
+               }

This looks rather fragile. I would suggest storing the link rate in
the bxt_clk_div structure and just looping through the array looking for
the correct rate. That will also work for normal DP, so less code in the
end.
Ok, I will do that.


        }

+

Spurious whitespace.
:(

        crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.ebb0 =
                PORT_PLL_P1(clk_div.p1) | PORT_PLL_P2(clk_div.p2);
        crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.pll0 = clk_div.m2_int;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index c9d50d1..e6ee7c6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static const struct dp_link_dpll chv_dpll[] = {
                { .p1 = 2, .p2 = 1, .n = 1, .m1 = 2, .m2 = 0x6c00000 } }
  };

+static const int bxt_rates[] = { 162000, 216000, 243000, 270000,
+                                 324000, 432000, 540000 };
  static const int skl_rates[] = { 162000, 216000, 270000,
                                  324000, 432000, 540000 };
  static const int chv_rates[] = { 162000, 202500, 210000, 216000,
@@ -1161,7 +1163,10 @@ intel_dp_sink_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, const int 
**sink_rates)
  static int
  intel_dp_source_rates(struct drm_device *dev, const int **source_rates)
  {
-       if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
+       if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
+               *source_rates = bxt_rates;
+               return ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_rates);
+       } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
                *source_rates = skl_rates;
                return ARRAY_SIZE(skl_rates);
        } else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev)) {
--
1.7.10.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to