On 05/06/2015 12:33 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
GGTT VMA sizes might be smaller than the whole object size due to different GGTT views.v2: - Separate GGTT view constraint calculations from normal view constraint calculations (Chris Wilson) v3: - Do not bother with debug wording. (Tvrtko Ursulin) v4: - Clearer logic for calculating map_and_fenceable (Tvrtko Ursulin) Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 23 ++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h | 4 ++ 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index c378f04..473e947 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -3498,7 +3498,8 @@ static bool i915_gem_valid_gtt_space(struct i915_vma *vma, } /** - * Finds free space in the GTT aperture and binds the object there. + * Finds free space in the GTT aperture and binds the object or a view of it + * there. */ static struct i915_vma * i915_gem_object_bind_to_vm(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, @@ -3517,36 +3518,60 @@ i915_gem_object_bind_to_vm(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, struct i915_vma *vma; int ret; - if(WARN_ON(i915_is_ggtt(vm) != !!ggtt_view)) - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + if (i915_is_ggtt(vm)) { + u32 view_size; + + if (WARN_ON(!ggtt_view)) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - fence_size = i915_gem_get_gtt_size(dev, - obj->base.size, - obj->tiling_mode); - fence_alignment = i915_gem_get_gtt_alignment(dev, - obj->base.size, - obj->tiling_mode, true); - unfenced_alignment = - i915_gem_get_gtt_alignment(dev, - obj->base.size, - obj->tiling_mode, false); + view_size = i915_ggtt_view_size(obj, ggtt_view); + + fence_size = i915_gem_get_gtt_size(dev, + view_size, + obj->tiling_mode); + fence_alignment = i915_gem_get_gtt_alignment(dev, + view_size, + obj->tiling_mode, + true); + unfenced_alignment = i915_gem_get_gtt_alignment(dev, + view_size, + obj->tiling_mode, + false); + size = flags & PIN_MAPPABLE ? fence_size : view_size; + } else { + fence_size = i915_gem_get_gtt_size(dev, + obj->base.size, + obj->tiling_mode); + fence_alignment = i915_gem_get_gtt_alignment(dev, + obj->base.size, + obj->tiling_mode, + true); + unfenced_alignment = + i915_gem_get_gtt_alignment(dev, + obj->base.size, + obj->tiling_mode, + false); + size = flags & PIN_MAPPABLE ? fence_size : obj->base.size; + }
I don't like this duplication, but apparently Chris wants it like this and plans to change it all shortly AFAIR. In the view of that:
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> Regards, Tvrtko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
