Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> writes: > With the binding regression from the original full ppgtt patches > fixed we can throw the switch. Yay! > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > index f005f3151147..819f2b2317ff 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > @@ -1557,12 +1557,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void > *data, > * dispatch_execbuffer implementations. We specifically > * don't want that set when the command parser is > * enabled. > - * > - * FIXME: with aliasing ppgtt, buffers that should only > - * be in ggtt still end up in the aliasing ppgtt. remove > - * this check when that is fixed. > */ > - if (USES_FULL_PPGTT(dev)) > + if (USES_PPGTT(dev)) > dispatch_flags |= I915_DISPATCH_SECURE; >
You can remove the check for USES_PPGTT here, like in patch that Chris posted. The i915_needs_cmd_parser() checks that for us. Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com> > exec_start = 0; > -- > 2.1.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
