On Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sha...@intel.com>
>
> This patch adds conditional checks in gen8_irq functions
> to support BXT. Most of the checks just look for PCH split
> availability, and block the call to PCH interrupt functions if
> not available.
>
> Reviewed-by: Satheeshakrishna M <satheeshakrishn...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <ppashank.sha...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 4a2f85b..3b82eb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -2372,7 +2372,13 @@ static irqreturn_t gen8_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> DRM_ERROR("The master control interrupt lied (DE
> PIPE)!\n");
> }
>
> - if (!HAS_PCH_NOP(dev) && master_ctl & GEN8_DE_PCH_IRQ) {
> + /*
> + * Todo: BXT doesnt have a PCH, so GEN8_DE_PCH_IRQ shouldn't
> + * be set. But until this part is confirmed, going paranoid, and adding
> + * a IS_BROXTON check here.
> + */
> + if (!IS_BROXTON(dev) && !HAS_PCH_NOP(dev) &&
> + master_ctl & GEN8_DE_PCH_IRQ) {
Drop the todo comment, and add HAS_PCH_SPLIT() instead of !IS_BROXTON()
here, and it's fine. We never want to call pch functions on non-pch
platforms, so this is IMO the obvious thing to do.
> /*
> * FIXME(BDW): Assume for now that the new interrupt handling
> * scheme also closed the SDE interrupt handling race we've seen
> @@ -3096,7 +3102,7 @@ static void ibx_irq_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>
> - if (HAS_PCH_NOP(dev))
> + if (HAS_PCH_NOP(dev) || !HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
> return;
No, I think it's much better to simply not call pch functions on non-pch
platforms. Instead, please add
if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
ibx_irq_reset(dev);
in gen8_irq_reset().
>
> GEN5_IRQ_RESET(SDE);
> @@ -3117,7 +3123,7 @@ static void ibx_irq_pre_postinstall(struct drm_device
> *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>
> - if (HAS_PCH_NOP(dev))
> + if (HAS_PCH_NOP(dev) || !HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
> return;
Same here, but for gen8_irq_postinstall().
>
> WARN_ON(I915_READ(SDEIER) != 0);
> @@ -3325,7 +3331,7 @@ static void ibx_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> u32 mask;
>
> - if (HAS_PCH_NOP(dev))
> + if (HAS_PCH_NOP(dev) || !HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
> return;
Ditto.
>
> if (HAS_PCH_IBX(dev))
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
