On 17/03/2015 09:39, Imre Deak wrote:
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index b89ab4d..3d4a7c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ static void skl_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
GEN8_LQSC_RO_PERF_DIS);
}
+static void bxt_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+ gen9_init_clock_gating(dev);
+}
+
static void i915_pineview_get_mem_freq(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
@@ -6503,7 +6508,12 @@ void intel_init_pm(struct drm_device *dev)
if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) {
skl_setup_wm_latency(dev);
- dev_priv->display.init_clock_gating = skl_init_clock_gating;
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
+ dev_priv->display.init_clock_gating =
+ bxt_init_clock_gating;
+ else
+ dev_priv->display.init_clock_gating =
+ skl_init_clock_gating;
This doesn't match the style in: "HardWare WorkAround ring
initialisation for Broxton", where we explicitly check the IS_BROXTON
and IS_SKYLAKE state.
dev_priv->display.update_wm = skl_update_wm;
dev_priv->display.update_sprite_wm = skl_update_sprite_wm;
} else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
