From: Deepak S <deepa...@linux.intel.com>

We update the GT PM interrupts mask at the end of set rps. We observed even
though we are requesting a RPn or RP0, there is a chance to get a DOWN or UP
interrupts before interrupts mask. These extra interrupts are simply wasting
cpu cycles. In this patch we mask the interrupts for given freq before
requesting new frequency.

Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepa...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 2e1ed07..bbfe4f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3879,12 +3879,12 @@ static void valleyview_set_rps(struct drm_device *dev, 
u8 val)
        if (WARN_ONCE(IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev) && (val & 1),
                      "Odd GPU freq value\n"))
                val &= ~1;
+       
+       I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, gen6_rps_pm_mask(dev_priv, val));
 
        if (val != dev_priv->rps.cur_freq)
                vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_REQ, val);
 
-       I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, gen6_rps_pm_mask(dev_priv, val));
-
        dev_priv->rps.cur_freq = val;
        trace_intel_gpu_freq_change(intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, val));
 }
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to