On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:48:16AM +0000, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: > From: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com> > > Start of explicit request management in the execbuffer code path. This patch > adds a call to allocate a request structure before all the actual hardware > work > is done. Thus guaranteeing that all that work is tagged by a known request. At > present, nothing further is done with the request, the rest comes later in the > series. > > The only noticable change is that failure to get a request (e.g. due to lack > of > memory) will be caught earlier in the sequence. It now occurs right at the > start > before any un-undoable work has been done. > > For: VIZ-5115 > Signed-off-by: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > index ca85803..61471e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > @@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void > *data, > const u32 ctx_id = i915_execbuffer2_get_context_id(*args); > u32 dispatch_flags; > int ret; > - bool need_relocs; > + bool need_relocs, batch_pinned = false; > > if (!i915_gem_check_execbuffer(args)) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -1525,10 +1525,16 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void > *data, > if (ret) > goto err; > > + batch_pinned = true; > params->batch_obj_vm_offset = > i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(batch_obj); > } else > params->batch_obj_vm_offset = i915_gem_obj_offset(batch_obj, > vm); > > + /* Allocate a request for this batch buffer nice and early. */ > + ret = dev_priv->gt.alloc_request(ring, ctx); > + if (ret) > + goto err; > + > /* > * Save assorted stuff away to pass through to *_submission(). > * NB: This data should be 'persistent' and not local as it will > @@ -1544,15 +1550,16 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void > *data, > > ret = dev_priv->gt.do_execbuf(params, args, &eb->vmas); > > +err: > /* > * FIXME: We crucially rely upon the active tracking for the (ppgtt) > * batch vma for correctness. For less ugly and less fragility this > * needs to be adjusted to also track the ggtt batch vma properly as > * active. > */ > - if (dispatch_flags & I915_DISPATCH_SECURE) > + if (batch_pinned) > i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(batch_obj); > -err: > + > /* the request owns the ref now */ > i915_gem_context_unreference(ctx); > eb_destroy(eb);
This hunk here looks wrong, or maybe the context changed sufficiently already (but I can't find that in previous patches). Why do we need to change the pinning for the ggtt batch pin hack when allocating the request earlier? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
