Dave Gordon <david.s.gor...@intel.com> writes:

> When querying the GTFIFOCTL register to check the FIFO space, the read value
> must be masked. The operation is repeated explicitly in several places. This
> change refactors the read-and-mask code into a function call.
>
> v2: rebased on top of Mika's forcewake patch set, specifically:
>       [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Enum forcewake domains and domain identifiers
>
> Change-Id: Id1a9f3785cb20b82d4caa330c37b31e4e384a3ef
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gor...@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c |   19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index 66365e7..a0331a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -205,6 +205,13 @@ static void fw_domains_put_with_fifo(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>       gen6_gt_check_fifodbg(dev_priv);
>  }
>  
> +static inline u32 fifo_free_entries(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +     u32 count = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL);
> +
> +     return count & GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
> +}
> +
>  static int __gen6_gt_wait_for_fifo(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       int ret = 0;
> @@ -212,16 +219,15 @@ static int __gen6_gt_wait_for_fifo(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       /* On VLV, FIFO will be shared by both SW and HW.
>        * So, we need to read the FREE_ENTRIES everytime */
>       if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
> -             dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count =
> -                     __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL) &
> -                                             GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
> +             dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count = fifo_free_entries(dev_priv);
>  
>       if (dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count < GT_FIFO_NUM_RESERVED_ENTRIES) {
>               int loop = 500;
> -             u32 fifo = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL) & 
> GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
> +             u32 fifo = fifo_free_entries(dev_priv);
> +
>               while (fifo <= GT_FIFO_NUM_RESERVED_ENTRIES && loop--) {
>                       udelay(10);
> -                     fifo = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL) & 
> GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
> +                     fifo = fifo_free_entries(dev_priv);
>               }
>               if (WARN_ON(loop < 0 && fifo <= GT_FIFO_NUM_RESERVED_ENTRIES))
>                       ++ret;
> @@ -277,8 +283,7 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_reset(struct drm_device *dev, 
> bool restore)
>  
>               if (IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev))
>                       dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count =
> -                             __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL) &
> -                             GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
> +                             fifo_free_entries(dev_priv);
>       }
>  
>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to