Update the hot plug function to handle the SST case. Instead of placing
the SST case within the long/short pulse block, it is now handled after
determining that MST mode is not in use. This way, the topology management
layer can handle any MST-related operations while SST operations are still
correctly handled afterwards.

This patch also corrects the problem of SST mode only being handled in the
case of a short (0.5ms - 1.0ms) HPD pulse. For compliance testing purposes
both short and long pulses are used by the different tests, thus both cases
need to be addressed for SST.

This patch replaces [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Fix intel_dp_hot_plug() in the
previous compliance testing patch sequence. Review feedback on that patch
indicated that updating intel_dp_hot_plug() was not the correct place for
the test handler.

V2:
- N/A
V3:
- Place the SST mode link status check into the mst_fail case
- Remove obsolete comment regarding SST mode operation
- Removed an erroneous line of code that snuck in during rebasing

Signed-off-by: Todd Previte <tprev...@gmail.com>

Conflicts:
        drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 16 ++++++----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 2d83f13..041df81 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4653,16 +4653,6 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port 
*intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
                        if (intel_dp_check_mst_status(intel_dp) == -EINVAL)
                                goto mst_fail;
                }
-
-               if (!intel_dp->is_mst) {
-                       /*
-                        * we'll check the link status via the normal hot plug 
path later -
-                        * but for short hpds we should check it now
-                        */
-                       drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex, 
NULL);
-                       intel_dp_check_link_status(intel_dp);
-                       drm_modeset_unlock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex);
-               }
        }
 
        ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
@@ -4674,6 +4664,12 @@ mst_fail:
                DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST device may have disappeared %d vs %d\n", 
intel_dp->is_mst, intel_dp->mst_mgr.mst_state);
                intel_dp->is_mst = false;
                drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, 
intel_dp->is_mst);
+       } else {
+               /* SST mode - handle short/long pulses here */
+               drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex, NULL);
+               intel_dp_check_link_status(intel_dp);
+               drm_modeset_unlock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex);
+               ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
        }
 put_power:
        intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain);
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to