On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:54:15PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > The role of eb_vmas continues to grow here as it becomes the proper > encapsulation for the data passed to the various execution function. > > Next patch makes use of it... This patch was initially part of the next patch, > but got split out after I had found a bug that convinced me the two should be > separate.
Again. No. There should only be one execbuffer implementation. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
