On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 08:49:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 06:00:31AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Self-explanatory code is better code.
>
> This causes the VDD off -> HPD -> VDD on -> VDD off -> HPD ... cycle to
> make another appearance on my BSW. Looks like you forgot to convert one return
> in intel_dp_hpd_pulse():
>
> @@ -4499,7 +4499,7 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port
> *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
> */
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ignoring long hpd on eDP port %c\n",
> port_name(intel_dig_port->port));
> - return false;
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("got hpd irq on port %c - %s\n",
Oh dear that's rather bad. Can you please supply a full patch so that Jani
can take it up for dinf? Free Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
<daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
fwiw (which isn't much).
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
